Extent of a valsartan drug shortage and its effect on antihypertensive drug use in the Canadian population: a national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages represent a growing global problem, with potentially serious consequences to patients and the health care system. Our study investigates the impacts of a major recall and shortage of valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), in July 2018 in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a time-series analysis of antihypertensive drugs dispensed in Canada between 2015 and 2019 using commercially available retail prescription data. Using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling, we evaluated the change in valsartan use after the recall. We also measured the overall use of ARBs, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other antihypertensive drug classes for the same period. RESULTS: After the recall in July 2018, valsartan use decreased 57.8%, from 362 231 prescriptions dispensed in June 2018 to 152 892 in September 2018 (difference = 209 339, p < 0.0001). Overall use of the ARB drug class decreased 2.0%, from 1 577 509 prescriptions dispensed in June 2018 to 1 545 591 in September 2018 (difference = 31 918, p = 0.0003), but use of non-valsartan ARBs increased 14.6%, from 1 215 278 to 1 392 699 prescriptions dispensed (difference = 177 421, p < 0.0001) in the same time frame. Although use of ACE inhibitors initially declined, this reduction was not sustained. The valsartan recall was not associated with a significant impact on use of other antihypertensive drug classes. INTERPRETATION: Our findings illustrate the impact of a major drug shortage, with the immediate and substantial reduction of valsartan dispensed and cascading effects on other ARBs, though future research is warranted to understand the consequences of such extensive shortages on clinical outcomes and health system costs. Improved policy strategies are needed to address the underlying causes of drug shortages and to mitigate their effects.

Current Status of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Recalls.

Losartan was the ninth most prescribed drug in the United States in 2016, and several other angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed. Since July 2018, >2 dozen specific ARB products have been recalled owing to the presence of potentially carcinogenic nitrosamine impurities in selected lots. As is the case with all U.S. drug recalls, the ARB recalls have been voluntary on the part of the companies involved. In April 2019, the Food and Drug Administration categorized marketed ARB products with respect to nitrosamine impurities: (1) not present, (2) to be determined with no prior lots removed from the market (TBD), or (3) to be determined in the context of prior lots having been removed from the market (TBD*). The data were structured as hundreds of rows of products. Owing to the complexity of these data, more than a year into the recalls, it remains difficult for clinicians to understand which ARB products are free of impurities.

Trends of atropinic (anticholinergic) exposure in the elderly: a 10-year analysis in the French EGB database.

Atropinic drugs are known to potentially induce physical and/or mental impairments in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate trends of atropinic exposure in patients ≥65 years in France between 2006 and 2015. A repeated cross-sectional study was performed quarterly from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015, in the 'Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (EGB)', a representative sample of the French population. Exposed patients were identified using the Anticholinergic Durán's list. Outcomes were rate of patients exposed to at least one atropinic drug (atropinic prevalence rate) and atropinic burden per patient (sum of atropinic burden scores). Interrupted time series were used to analyze the impact of market withdrawal of some drugs with atropinic properties during the period of the study. The number of patients ≥65 years registered in the EGB ranged from 75 611 in 2006 to 95 389 in 2015. Atropinic prevalence rate decreased significantly from 45.6% in 2006 to 33.2% in 2015 (-12.4%, slope significance P < 0.05). Subjects aged ≥85 years were the most exposed. Total atropinic burden decreased significantly between 2006 and 2015 (2.2 ± 1.7 in 2006; 2.0 ± 1.5 in 2015; slope significance P < 0.05), especially in patients ≥85 years. Market withdrawals for safety reasons of some atropinic drugs were significantly associated with a decrease in the atropinic prevalence rate (P < 0.05) and atropinic burden per patient (P < 0.05). In conclusion, atropinic drug exposure in the elderly significantly decreased in France between 2006 and 2015. This decrease can be partly explained by regulatory measures against some atropinic drugs.

Moulds associated with contaminated ocular and injectable drugs: FDA recalls, epidemiology considerations, drug shortages, and aseptic processing.

Recent (2012) grave but rare outbreaks of fungal meningitis and endophthalmitis associated with drugs contaminated with select environmental moulds (Exserohilum and Fusarium, respectively) have exacerbated mycology concerns for formulation, good laboratory practices (GLP), and use of the final drug product. Intensified investigations (2013-2015) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that included added responsibilities for specialty compounding laboratories have prompted at least nine voluntary mould-related drug recalls during 2014-2015. Both primary manufactures (five recalls, two companies) and secondary-processing compound laboratories (at least eight recalls, six companies) and near 0.8 million units were involved. These constituted minor fractions of recalled drug products in an estimated 2500 recalls among other causes during this time period. Recalls of similar drugs in 2016 were indirectly related to fungi. None of the mould-related- drug-recall episodes during 2014-2016 have been identified with fungal disease outbreaks. The recalls included drugs in short supply worldwide such as injectable sodium chloride- and related saline solutions as well as ocular formulations. Insufficient environmental monitoring and GLP compliance, particularly for aseptic processing of non-preserved formulations, appeared to be underlying factors in the fungal contaminations. Observations of mould growth in drugs during their processing should be accurately recorded and investigated; cryptic listings under "particulate" designations should be avoided. Confirmed identifications for chronic contaminants are recommended. Heat-tolerant moulds with resistant morphotypes are prime concerns.

Quality of Medicines in Portugal: A Retrospective Review of Medicine Recalls (2000-2015).

INFARMED, the Portuguese national health authority, alerts the general public and health care professionals about quality or safety issues detected in health products. The present study analyses recalls of substandard medicines in Portugal between 2005 and 2015. All 338 alerts for medicine recalls were analysed, which represents a total of 378 drugs withdrawn. Despite the fact that the total number of medicine alerts has increased during the past decade, the number of actual medicine recalls remained relatively constant. The number of batches affected in each recall varies from only one to several batches. In addition, 294 of the alerts are related to voluntary recalls, that is, those initiated by the marketing authorisation holder, whereas only 40 were mandatory recalls. There are marketing authorisation holders that have had several medicine recalls over the period studied. The main cause of product recall was the pharmaceutical dosage form, followed by packaging problems. Forty-two percent of the withdrawn medicines are from solid oral forms, a value slightly higher than that obtained for the injectables group. Finally, substandard medicines have been accessible in the Portuguese market for a period that varied between one month and over four years. The data seem to show that the number of substandard medicines in Portugal has not been increasing. However, this may be due to a variety of causes, that is, better performance of the industry, non-detection of these cases, and so on.LAY ABSTRACT: INFARMED, the Portuguese national health authority, alerts the general public and health care professionals about quality or safety issues detected in health products. The present study analyses market recalls of substandard medicines in Portugal between 2005 and 2015. All 338 alerts for medicine recalls were analysed, which represents a total of 378 drugs withdrawn. Despite the fact that the total number of medicine alerts has increased during the past decade, the number of actual medicine recalls has remained relatively constant. In addition, 294 of the alerts are related to voluntary recalls, that is, initiated by the marketing authorisation holder, whereas only 40 were mandatory recalls. There are marketing authorisation holders that have had several medicine recalls over the period studied. It was also found that substandard medicines have been accessible in the Portuguese market for a period that varied between 1 month and over 4 years. The data seem to show that the number of substandard medicines in Portugal has not been increasing. However, this may be due to a variety of causes, that is, better performance of the industry, non-detection of these cases, and so on.

Marketing and Testosterone Treatment in the USA: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration only for classic hypogonadism, although off-label indications have resulted in a dramatic expansion in prescriptions in the USA. Marketing may significantly affect prescriber behavior. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review all available evidence on marketing and TRT in the USA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched up to July 2017 for all relevant publications reporting on assessments of the TRT market size, economic costs associated with hypogonadism, trends in TRT prescriptions, drug discontinuation rates, and advertising and sales efforts in the USA. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. The market size for hypogonadism constitutes 5.6-76.8% of men in the USA, with the lower end of the range representing the strictest criteria for diagnosis. Men with a diagnosis of hypogonadism consume $14 118 in direct and indirect costs to the payer. Over the last 2 decades, TRT prescriptions have increased between 1.8- and 4-fold. After 1 yr, 80-85% of men discontinue TRT. There is an association between direct-to-consumer advertising and testosterone testing, TRT prescriptions, and TRT without testosterone testing. There is a high prevalence of misinformation on Internet advertising. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label indications have driven the dramatic expansion of TRT prescriptions over the last 2 decades. Direct-to-consumer advertising poses a unique challenge in the USA. Overtreatment can be avoided by applying strict diagnostic criteria for hypogonadism, which limits the addressable market for TRT. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we reviewed the relationship between marketing and testosterone therapy in the USA. We found that many patients are prescribed testosterone without an appropriate diagnosis of hypogonadism, which may be related to the marketing efforts for off-label prescribing.

Desabastecimientos de medicamentos en un hospital de tercer nivel en España / Shortages in medicinal products in a tertiary care hospital in Spain

No disponible

Trends in Non-prescription Drug Recalls in Japan.

Recalls of non-prescription drugs can contribute to preventing harm to human health, however, they also interrupt the supply of medicines to the market. The aim of the present study was to investigate the trends in non-prescription drug recalls in Japan. Class I, II, and III recalls reported from April 2009 to March 2014 were obtained from the websites of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Each drug recall was classified according to year, dosage form, therapeutic category, and reasons for the recall. The trends over the 5 year period were assessed for each class. A total of 220 recalls were reported in the 5-year study period. The numbers of drug recalls were 21, 16, 80, 58, and 45 in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. The drugs recalled consisted of 177 internal medications, 35 topical agents, and 8 others. Drug recalls were observed in 12 therapeutic categories of drug effects. The largest number of recalls was for Chinese herbal medicines and crude drugs. Of all the drug recalls in 2011, Chinese herbal medicines and crude drugs produced by one manufacturer accounted for 84%. Slightly more than half (54%) of drug recalls were due to a violation of the regulations. One manufacturer recalled many drugs because of non-compliance with the standard regulations for manufacturing drugs after 2011. In conclusion, non-prescription drug recalls can occur for any drug regardless of the dosage form and therapeutic category.

Characteristics of FDA drug recalls: A 30-month analysis.

PURPOSE: The characteristics of drug recalls issued over 30 months by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were analyzed. METHODS: All FDA-issued recalls for drugs (prescription and nonprescription, including dietary supplements) and biological products issued from June 20, 2012, to December 31, 2014, were included in this retrospective analysis. Data for all drug recalls were downloaded and sorted by the inclusion criteria from weekly FDA enforcement reports. The following data were analyzed: product type, recall firm, type of recall firm (compounding or noncompounding), country, voluntary or involuntary recall, method of communication of recall, recall number, FDA recall classification (class I, II, or III), product availability (prescription or nonprescription), reason for recall, recall initiation date, and recall report date. RESULTS: A total of 21,120 products were recalled during the 30-month study period. Of these, 3,045 drug products (14.4%) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. A total of 348 total manufacturers were associated with recalled drug products. The 5 firms most frequently involved in recalls accounted for 299, 273, 212, 118, and 112 recalls. The most common reasons for recalls were contamination, mislabeling, adverse reaction, defective product, and incorrect potency. There was a significant association between FDA recall classification and the following outcomes: reasons for recall, product availability, type of recall firm, and form of communication. CONCLUSION: An investigation of FDA drug recalls revealed that the five most common recall reasons were contamination, mislabeling, adverse reaction, defective product, and incorrect potency. Compounding firms were associated more frequently with contamination than were noncompounding firms.

Quality of medicines in Canada: a retrospective review of risk communication documents (2005-2013).

OBJECTIVE: To explore the quality and safety of medicines in Canada. DESIGN: A retrospective review of drug recalls and risk communication documents conveying issues relating to defective (ie, substandard and falsified) medicines. SETTING: The Health Canada website search for drug recalls and risk communication documents issued between 2005 and 2013. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Drug recalls and risk communication documents related to quality defect in medicinal products. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relevant data about defective medicines reported in drug recalls and risk communication documents, including description of the defect, type of formulation, year of the recall and category of the recall or the document. RESULTS: There were 653 defective medicines of which 649 were substandard. The number of defective medicines reported by Health Canada increased from 42 in 2005 to 143 in 2013. The two most frequently reported types of defects were stability (205 incidents) and contamination issues (139 incidents). Some of these defects were found to be more prominent and repetitive over other types within some manufacturers. Tablet formulation (251 incidents) was the formulation most frequently compromised. No significant differences were observed between the manufacturers and distributors in the number of substandard medicines reported under each defect type. There were only four falsified medicines reported over the 9-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Substandard medicines are a problem in Canada and have resulted in an increasing number of recalled medicines. Most of the failures were related to stability issues, raising the need to investigate the root causes and for stringent preventative measures to be implemented by manufacturers.

Prescripción en Cascada y Desprescripción / No disponible

La prescripción en cascada se produce cuando un nuevo fármaco es prescrito para "tratar" una reacción adversa producida por otro fármaco, basándose en la creencia errónea de que una nueva condición médica se ha desarrollado. Los acontecimientos adversos asociados a la prescripción en cascada se producen cuando el segundo fármaco aumenta la severidad de la reacción adversa producida por el primer fármaco, o cuando el segundo fármaco expone al paciente a la aparición de nuevas reacciones adversas. La clave para prevenir la prescripción en cascada reside en la prevención y rápida detección de las reacciones adversas. Los profesionales de la salud deben ser capaces de reconocer cuándo un medicamento debe ser retirado y cómo hacerlo. La desprescripción debe considerarse cuando existe polimedicación, reacciones adversas a medicamentos, ineficacia del tratamiento, caídas o cuando los objetivos del tratamiento han cambiado. Un enfoque cauteloso de la desprescripción incluye dos principios: retirar los fármacos de uno en uno y disminuir las dosis gradualmente durante semanas o meses(AU)

A prescribing cascade occurs when a new medicine is prescribed to ‘treat’ an adverse reaction to another drug in the mistaken belief that a new medical condition requiring treatment has developed. Adverse outcomes associated with prescribing cascades can result when the second drug increases the severity of the adverse reaction to the first drug or when the second drug places the patient at risk of additional adverse drug reactions. The key to preventing prescribing cascades lies in the avoidance and early detection of adverse drug reactions and an increased awareness and recognition of the potential for adverse reactions. Medicines have adverse effects and the use of multiple medicines, polypharmacy, can be associated with poorer outcomes. Health professionals need to recognise when medicines should be ceased and how to deprescribe. Deprescribing could be considered when there is polypharmacy, adverse drug reactions, ineffective treatment, falls or when treatment goals have changed. If patients are slowly weaned off their medicines, withdrawal and rebound syndromes are usually not serious. A cautious approach to deprescribing includes two principles - stop one drug at a time and wean doses slowly over weeks and months(AU)

Adverse drug reactions of psycopharmacs.

BACKGROUND: The objective of analysis of ADRs caused by drugs that pertain to the ATC group N (nervous system), as reported to the Croatian Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices for the period from March 2005 to December 2008, was to examine the types of ADRs collected in said period, the profile of reporters and the possible impacts this could have on prescribing this group of medicinal products in the future. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study of ADRs was performed. Drugs causing ADRs were grouped according to the ATC drug classification, and subsequently entered into a database. Data were analyzed in respect of total number, gender, age, type, seriousness, expectedness, outcome, system organ class, suspected drug and reporter. RESULTS: The findings showed that 15% of all reported ADRs were caused by drugs from the ATC group N. 60% of these were caused by drugs belonging to the ATC subgroups N05 (psycholeptics) and N06A (antidepressants). A significant increase in the percentage of serious ADRs in the examined groups of medicinal products was observed. Analysis of expectedness showed that the share of unexpected ADRs is very high. CONCLUSION: The distribution of reporters is not satisfactory. The Agency, as regulatory authority, cannot undertake certain measures to improve the safe use of medicinal products without having reports. Only reporting of ADRs can result in changes to benefit all patient populations. Our joint aim should be avoiding a great number of ADRs and maintaining overall safe use of medicinal products.

Knowledge of interim recommendations and use of Hib vaccine during vaccine shortages.

OBJECTIVES: The goals were to determine among pediatricians and family physicians (1) knowledge of interim recommendations regarding Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine administration, (2) current practices, and (3) factors associated with nonadherence. METHODS: An Internet-based survey was conducted in April 2008 among national samples. RESULTS: Response rates were 68% (220 of 325 physicians) among pediatricians and 51% (153 of 302 physicians) among family physicians. Seventy-three percent of pediatricians and 45% of family medicine physicians reported insufficient Hib vaccine supplies, and 22% to 24% reported having to defer doses for infants 2 to 6 months of age > or =10% of the time. Ninety-eight percent of pediatricians and 81% of family physicians were aware of the interim recommendations (P < or = .0001), and virtually all knew that the booster dose should be deferred; however, 22% of pediatricians and 33% of family medicine physicians reported not deferring this dose. Physicians in both specialties were less likely to adhere to recommendations to defer in this age group if they thought that their practice had sufficient vaccine supplies (pediatricians, odds ratio: 0.01 [95% confidence interval: 0.003-0.03]; family medicine physicians, odds ratio: 0.10 [95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.33]). Family medicine physicians were less likely to adhere to recommendations if they had not heard about the interim recommendations (odds ratio: 0.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.21]). CONCLUSIONS: Most primary care physicians experienced Hib vaccine shortages, and many have had to defer doses for 2- to 6-month-old children. Most are knowledgeable regarding interim recommendations, but one-fifth to one-third reported nonadherence.

Safety assessment of recalled Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccines--United States, 2007-2008.

PURPOSE: On 13 December 2007, Merck & Co., Inc. voluntarily recalled 1.2 million doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines that had been distributed since April 2007 for concerns regarding potential Bacillus cereus contamination. Enhanced postrecall surveillance was conducted to detect vaccine-associated B. cereus infections. METHODS: We reviewed reports involving recalled Hib vaccines received by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during 1 April 2007-29 February 2008. For each reported death, autopsy review sought evidence of B. cereus infections. For each specified outcome, the proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) were calculated to compare the recalled Hib vaccines with the manufacturer's nonrecalled Hib vaccines in the VAERS databases. On 20 December 2007, we used the Epidemic Information Exchange (Epi-X) to solicit nongastrointestinal vaccine-associated B. cereus infections, and requested B. cereus isolates for genotyping to compare with the manufacturing facility isolate. RESULTS: VAERS received 75 reports involving recalled Hib vaccines; none described a confirmed B. cereus infection. Comparative analyses did not reveal disproportionate reporting of specified outcomes for recalled Hib vaccines. The Epi-X posting triggered one report of vaccine-associated B. cereus bacteremia from a child who received a nonrecalled Hib vaccine manufactured by Merck; the genotypes of isolates from the patient and the manufacturing facility differed. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of vaccine-associated B. cereus infection had been found in recipients of recalled Hib vaccines. Conducting laboratory surveillance through Epi-X was feasible and may enhance public health response capacities for future vaccine safety emergencies.